Spread the love
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

I found a few comments on other peoples blogs that just made me chuckle this morning.

This one about whether or not a pro-abortion author should use a pseudoynm:

“She’s been asked to tell her story again, this time in a book. And she’s wondering if she should use her real name. Because a bunch of wingnuts in this country could consider harassing or even worse, killing her to be a rational and reasonable reaction to her having exercised her legal right to take the best care of her son she could.”

Oh ugh…..people who would dare question or condemn someone in the situation you guys have been in need beaten.

Oh the irony!

These two from the ongoing Catholic/Protestant theological wars where pigs have yet to sprout wings and fly:

the infallible God infallibly guided a fallible church with fallible men.

We don’t deny that the church formalized the canon that GOD GAVE TO THEM.

This does not mean that the bishop of Rome is the spiritual leader of the world and it does not mean that Rome is the head of the “one true church”

Uh… right.

And this commenter just proves that language arts isn’t a strong point for everyone.

I know the arguement about how Jesus didn’t speak in greek so the word for rock would have been the same word, but you do not know exactly how Jesus stated what would become Matt 16:18. The fact is the Holy Spirit led Matthew to use two different greek words for rock. If Peter was meant to be the foundation of the church, there would be no discrepancy in the terminology. Jesus would have either said by name or pronoun (e.g. “on you…) that Peter is the foundation.

Save This Page

Digg It

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Please browse my eBay items!

(Visited 5 times, 1 visits today)