My e-Bay Store
Please feel free to leave a comment under the posting, or sign my Spiritbook (guestbook) and chat on the tag board at the bottom of the page.





"the family is called...the domestic church." John Paul II





Subscribe to My Domestic Church







My Domestic Church Family Store -NEW!
Life-Giving Love ![]() |
A Mother's Rule Of Life ![]() |



My Daily Catholic Bible (Revised Standard Version) Begin reading on any calendar date and twelve months later you'll have made your way through all seventy-three books of the biblical canon.


|
|

Some forty years ago, as the dramatic events of the Second Vatican Council unfolded, a spotlight was trained on the Catholic Church. It was, commentators said, a revolutionary time.
For more than three decades now, as a sociologist and a priest, I have been tracking the evolution of the beliefs and practices of the Catholic clergy and laity in the United States. My most recent analysis, based on survey data that I and others have gathered periodically since Vatican II, reveals a striking trend: a generation of conservative young priests is on the rise in the U.S. Church. These are newly ordained men who seem in many ways intent on restoring the pre-Vatican II Church, and who, reversing the classic generational roles, define themselves in direct opposition to the liberal priests who came of age in the 1960s and 1970s.
The divisions created by Vatican II are not new, of course. Caught up in the reform euphoria that followed the council, the lower clergy and the laity almost immediately developed a new ideology based on respect for women and for the freedom (including the sexual freedom) of the laity. On these matters, quietly or loudly, the laity and the lower clergy did resist the teachings of the Church.
The backlash was swift.
Newly appointed bishops would restore the rules; theologians who disagreed would be silenced; and, as much as possible, the old order would be re-established.
Even some of the progressives of the council, frightened by the laity's exuberant interest in change and by the declining influence of the Church in the United States, lost their nerve and joined in the call for a Restoration. Today's young conservative priests are rallying to this call.
But only about 40 percent of the younger generation believe that birth control is always wrong;a revealing failure of the Restoration efforts of the past thirty years, which have been fundamentally opposed to birth control.
To explain the laity's dissatisfaction with the Church, priests from all generations tend to trot out the usual litany: individualism, materialism, secularism, lack of faith, lack of prayer, lack of commitment, media bias, hedonism, sexual freedom, feminism, family breakdown, lack of education, and apathy. The advantage of such explanations is that they free priests from any personal responsibility and put the blame on factors over which the clergy cannot be expected to exercise much control. The rectory thus becomes an isolated citadel battered by cultural forces, which encourages precisely the sort of closed, band-of-brothers mentality that the Vatican II reforms were designed to break down.
Dean Signed Into Law Measure Providing Guarantying Insurance Coverage for Certain Forms of Contraceptives. In 1999, Howard Dean signed into law a measure requiring insurance companies who cover prescription drugs to cover FDA-approved forms of contraceptives. [Contemporary Women's Issues, 9/99]
You are under attack by fellow Catholics who do not even recognize our right to support Dean as Catholics. I will post links to blogs and other active debates about the very legitimacy of this site here and update it frequently. Please visit and post links to relevant parts of this site and offer your own arguments and knowledge of Catholic teaching. Fellow Catholics have declared war on us--let's respond to them with love, reaching out to them with understanding as well as careful argumentation.
What I found particularly interesting however, is what these ladies are not saying Here's an excerpt
They don't know "the fear, the danger, the loss of control over the most private decisions," said Oberst, an attorney who works for the Oregon State Bar. "We don't ever want to go back to those days."
Loss of control? But she's not really speaking of rape or incest, nor is she speaking of medical conditions beyond the control of a woman.
Both Oberst and Le Guin told stories about how abortion laws affected their lives, either directly or indirectly. Both said legalized abortions allow women the freedom to dream and determine their own destinies.
Well, you determine your own destiny when you wait to have sexual intercourse in marriage. But note that this isn't about physical health or mental health, now it's OK to acknowledge that we are killing our offspring because of our "dreams."
"That brief carwash experience made me more grateful than ever that I was headed for college," she said. "More importantly, it made me more aware than ever that in a country without choice, a young woman's dreams can die very quickly."
O.K., but other dreams are born, and as was mentioned on Ms. Welborn's blog, it's just 9 months. You postpone your plans but they don't necessarily have to die.
Le Guin, best-selling author of "The Left Hand of Darkness" and many other novels, said she had an abortion as a young woman, and has been a strong supporter of abortion rights ever since.
Like Oberst, she said it's difficult to convey the deep changes that occurred for women over the three decades since Roe v. Wade, the federal case that legalized abortion. She compared being pregnant and 20 years old in the 1950s to living under fundamentalist Islamic law.
Uh, well I think she would have been stoned or something if that was true. The 1960s was the dawn of the sexual revolution anyway so I have no idea what she's talking about.
If she hadn't disobeyed the law and had the abortion, Le Guin said, she never would have went to college or met her husband as the two were sailing on a ship for England as Fulbright scholars.
Well why? Why would having a baby stop her from doing that.
It's a disturbing trend that the pro-abortion folks aren't even trying to pretend any more that it's about women, and women's health. At least it's more honest I guess. We always knew it wasn't about that really.
"We have a real struggle ahead of us," Oberst said.

No one understood the heart of St. Paul better than St. Timothy. His finest legacy is the two epistles he wrote to Timothy. Today would be an opportune occasion to study these epistles and to apply personally the high ideals proposed.
Look up the descriptions St. Paul gives of his traveling companion, Tim: 1, Cor. 4:17, Phil. 2:19-20, Rom. 16:21, and 2 Tim. 1:4-5.
St. Paul left a worthy monument to Titus, his faithful disciple, in his letter. Read this letter.
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - A Belgian cardinal has said only five to 10 percent of lesbians and gays are actually gay and the rest are "sexual perverts".
"I am willing to write in my own blood that of all those who call themselves lesbian or gay, a maximum of five to 10 percent are effectively lesbian or gay," Cardinal Gustaaf Joos, 80, told the Belgian weekly P-Magazine in an interview published on Wednesday.
"All the rest are just sexual perverts," said Joos, who is also a parish priest in the small Belgian town of Landskouter.
"I demand you write that down," said Joos, who was made a cardinal by Pope John Paul late last year. "I don't care if they all come protesting at my door. I won't open the door."
The Belgian Catholic church reacted to the interview by saying Joos was speaking in a private capacity.

One key point we keep making on the discussions is about how and why the sex act is actually used by married couples, and in this sense, there is absolutely no difference between NFP and ABC in the acts couples make use of (assuming they're using NFP to avoid conception). And so the issue is not whether abstinence is a legitimate means of contraception while other methods are not, but that non-procreative sex is non-procreative sex is non-procreative sex. The Holy Father knew this, and tried to condone rhythm anyway, because it makes use of a natural method and places no obstacle to fertility. But one could easily counter that making use of the act only during the infertile time of the month is placing a kind of obstacle to fertility--namely, the absence of an ovum!!! "Nature" does this, I know, and that is a difference, only the plain fact is that NFP couples learn about the monthly cycle and make use of what nature provides to insure that their sex acts will be infertile. So the act is used precisely *because* it is infertile, and this further blurs the line between NFP and ABC, leaving only the objective structure of the act per se as the telling factor. All in all, that seems a pretty trivial criterion to use for evaluating the morality of a sex act, the bottom line being whether a penis is ejaculating semen into a vagina with no barrier or hormonal obstructions to conception. That's pretty much it, I'm afraid. If you do this, the act is not intrinsically evil; if you don't, it is. Heaven and hell hang in the balance. Makes no sense to me!
The Rosarium
A Petition to the Canadian Bishops
"Contraception is to be judged objectively so profoundly unlawful, as never to be, for any reason, justified. To think or to say the contrary is equal to maintaining that in human life, situations may arise in which it is lawful not to recognize God as God."
(Pope John Paul II, quoted in L’Osservatore Romano, Oct.10, 1983 )
Your Eminences, Your Graces, and Your Excellencies,
As you know, the contraceptive mentality pervades the Catholic Church in Canada. Most Catholic couples of child-bearing age are preventing children through sterilization or contraception. The birthrate is suicidal. The death of the Church is certain where contraception prevails. It has been truly said that “Our greatest moral responsibility is to convert the contraceptive mentality”.
Contraception is the root of which many spiritual evils are the fruit: abortion, infidelity, divorce, pre-marital sex, acceptance of homosexual activity, the clamor for same-sex “marriage” and the corruption of politics and the media. These inevitably follow when, on a large scale, sexual activity is deliberately diverted from its life-giving purpose to sterile lustful indulgence.
Because moral and social disaster does not occur in a vacuum without the Church's involvement, it must be acknowledged that, in Canada, the contraceptive mentality was fostered by the Winnipeg Statement of the Canadian bishops published on September 27, 1968. In that Statement, Catholics were told that in some circumstances spouses “may be safely assured that, whoever chooses that course [i.e. contraception] which seems right to him does so in good conscience” (26). This teaching is against charity, justice and the truth. It is in contradiction to the constant teaching of the Church that contraception is an intrinsic evil permitting of no exceptions (Humanae Vitae, 14). Countless Catholics have referred to the Winnipeg Statement in justification of their contraceptive practice.
To restore in Canada the truth about life and love we ask that the Winnipeg Statement be revoked by you, our spiritual shepherds. We ask that all marriage preparation courses, all catechetical texts and teaching, preaching, and confessional advice be in accordance with Humanae Vitae, given to us with the authority of Christ (HV,6).
Such action on the part of a national hierarchy would not be unprecedented. In 1990, the bishops of the Philippines issued a pastoral letter in which they apologized for their failure to promote the Church’s teaching on contraception. They said: “We abandoned you to your confused and lonely consciences with a lame excuse: 'follow what your conscience tells you'. How little did we realize that it was our consciences that needed to be formed first.”
In the United States, the U.S. Conference of Bishops, in their November 2003 meeting, voted in favor of issuing a strong document explaining why contraception is wrong. It will be widely distributed in parish pamphlet racks and taught in high schools and colleges. Bishop Gregory, President of the American Bishops’ Conference said: “In many respects we haven’t spoken clearly enough, effectively enough, frequently enough. If anything, the actions we are taking today are very much needed and, many would say, even late.”
While the undersigned earnestly petition for the withdrawal of the Winnipeg Statement, we assure you, our bishops, of our constant prayers. Although our obedience and fidelity are assured, our pleas for retraction will continue year after year, if necessary, until the Bishops of Canada retract this Statement. And our movement, because it is founded on the divine law of love and faith, will only increase in strength. One day the Winnipeg Statement will fall. Although its end is inevitable, we pray that its retraction comes sooner rather than later.
May God bless you, the Holy Spirit guide you and Mary intercede for you in your apostolic mission.
Sunday Thought - more Muggeridge on Humanae Vitae
Humanae Vitae recognized this and asked of Catholics what many of them were unable to accord, that they should not fall into this error, that they should eschew this dangerous procedure which was now being made available in terms at once infinitely simple, but also infinitely more dangerous. Namely, the birth pill...What I want to say tonight, as a non-Catholic, as an aspiring Christian, as someone who, as an old journalist, has watched this process of deterioration in our whole way of life - what I want to say is that in that encyclical the finger is pointed on the point that really matters. Namely, that through human procreation the great creativity of men and women comes into play, and that to interfere with this creativity, to seek to relate it merely to pleasure, is to go back into pre-Christian times and ultimately to destroy the civilization that Christianity has brought about.
...There is no beauty, there is no joy, there is no compensation that anything could offer in the way of leisure, of so-called freedom from domestic duties, which could possibly compensate for one-thousandth part of the joy that an old man feels when he sees this beautiful thing: life beginning again as his ends, in those children that have come into the world through his love and through a marriage which has lasted through 50 and more years. I assure you that what I say to you is true, and when you are that age there is nothing that this world can offer in the way of success, in the way of adventure, in the way of honors, in the way of variety, in the way of so-called freedom, which could come within a hundredth part of measuring up to that wonderful sense of having been used as an instrument, not in the achievement of some stupid kind of personal erotic excitement, but in the realization of this wonderful thing - human procreation.
At the end of the film, after we had all had a chance to recover, a question and answer period ensued. The unanimous praise for the film from a rather diverse crowd, was as astounding as the compliments were effusive. The questions included the one question that seems to follow this film, even though it has not yet even been released. "Why is this film considered by some to be "anti-Semitic?" Frankly, having now experienced (you do not "view" this film) "The Passion" it is a question that is impossible to answer.
A law professor whom I admire sat in front of me. He raised his hand and responded "After watching this film, I do not understand how anyone can insinuate that it even remotely presents that the Jews killed Jesus. It doesn't." He continued "It made me realized that my sins killed Jesus." I agree. There is not a scintilla of anti-Semitism to be found anywhere in this powerful film. If there were, I would be among the first to decry it. It faithfully tells the Gospel story in a dramatically beautiful, sensitive profoundly engaging way.
Those who are alleging otherwise have either not seen the film or have another agenda behind their protestations. This is not a "Christian" film, in the sense that it will appeal only to those who identify themselves as followers of Jesus Christ. It is a deeply human, beautiful story that will deeply touch all men and women. it is a profound work of art. Yes, its producer is a Catholic Christian and thankfully has remained faithful to the Gospel text; if that is no longer acceptable behavior then we are all in trouble. History demands that we remain faithful to the story and Christians have a right to tell it. After all, we believe that it is the greatest story ever told and that its message is for all men and women The greatest right is the right to hear the truth.
How ironic that when a movie producer takes artistic license with historical events, he is lionized as artistic, creative and brilliant, but when another takes special care to be true to the real-life story, he is vilified. Actor-producer Mel Gibson is discovering these truths the hard way as he is having difficulty finding a United States studio or distributor for his upcoming film, "The passion," which depicts the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ.
Mel Gibson co-wrote the script and financed, directed and produced the movie. For the script, he and his co-author relied on the New Testament Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, as well as the diaries of St. Anne Catherine Emmerich (1774-1824) and Mary of Agreda's "The City of God."
Gibson doesn't want this to be like other sterilized religious epics. "I'm trying to access the story on a very personal level and trying to be very real about it." So committed to realistically portraying what many would consider the most important half-day in the history of the universe, Gibson even shot the film in the Aramaic language of the period. In response to objections that viewers will not be able to understand that language, Gibson said, "Hopefully, I'll be able to transcend the language barriers with my visual storytelling; if I fail, I fail, but at least it'll be a monumental failure."
The Beatitudes are paradoxes in other ways as well. Wherever we find ourselves in this spiritual journey, we cannot help but notice the apparent contradictions bound up in Our Lord's puzzling promises: the poor are rich; those who mourn are blessed; the meek will be powerful; the hungry shall be filled; the persecuted are blessed.
How contrary this is to the messages of the world in which live. They urge you to pretend to be rich or powerful. They want you to play along when they assure you that you're loved without limit or qualifications when you really are not. For example, the bank offers constant reassurance that you have a friend there, someone who will personally cater to your every need. But try testing how far that relationship will actually go without sufficient collateral to back it up! Multiple roadblocks quickly rise up to hinder your quest for financial help.
The smiling faces on TV seem sincerely solicitous as to whether or not you're able to clean the greasy pots, or polish your kitchen floor to a brilliant shine, or banish all the germs from your bathroom. Don't be fooled. Remember that advertising agencies hire actors and actresses to sell that particular pot scrubber or floor wax or antibacterial cleanser. Oblivious to your personal needs, these players regard you as merely a pawn in the world of marketing, a faceless consumer who holds the money.
Your "friendly neighborhood insurance agents assure you they have your best interests at heart. Their proffered love and care look so sincere--until you submit a claim and find out what the fine print excludes. You discover that the bottom line may override the best intentions of an insurance agent if the company is to remain in business.
The messages of the Beatitudes are just the opposite of all this make-believe happiness. They are not pretense or empty promises. These few words powerfully open up to us what it really means to live as a Christian, just as the dawning sun pours into an unobstructed window facing east.
This is another inspiring story that I’ve read of late and good for these parents who finally have the guts to speak out. It’s not just us news hounds who have gotten the message. Bishops and chancery offices HAVE PROVEN REPEATEDLY THAT THEY ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED and the laity has caught on.
Dear Spokesperson for the Arlington Diocese:
You said:
They [Catholic parents paying for a Catholic education] don't need to have their children do it, but they should not impose those beliefs on others, she said.
Well, my dear, isn’t imposing ones beliefs on others exactly what you and your archdiocese is attempting to do? What have you and the American Catholic Church done to earn the trust of Catholic parents? I could mention more than a few things that bishops have NOT done to earn the trust of parents and thousands of young children (not to mention 1 billion + in money damages).
I think some parents want to be the moral authority for everyone.
I think hundreds of bishops and dioceses throughout the country, who have lost all moral authority after the sexual abuse scandal cover ups, now come along and want the laity to believe that they have a shinny new imprimatured plan that’s going to fix everything. We are not as stupid or gullible as you think. Nor wil we ever be as silent as we've been in the past.
We have good people who are extremely well-trained who can teach this program.
Sure you do. Just like you had “good” priests who were also “extremely well trained” who proceeded to molest young boys and who were then transferred to other parishes to do it all over again by their bishop. Sorry, your sales pitch is not credible.
Here’s an idea for you, Missy.
Why don’t you have a program for bishops and priests?
Teach them in detail about the horrible crime of sexual abuse and you might want to include a few bible passages in the course. Tell them that they are obligated to report any instance of sexual abuse to the proper civil authorities immediately. Tell them that if they know of a bishop or priest who even MAY be involved in sexual abuse of a child, that this is also to be reported to the proper civil authorities.
If the love of the Church is not convincing for these priests and bishops, tell them that they will be faced with serious jail time if convicted of even one offense and that the Church (read: Parishioners) are not going to foot the bill for their defense.
Very truly yours,
Sock
Getting into a lengthy discussion about the various merits of scapegoating homosexuals in general or sex addict priests in particular on Mark Shea's contentious blog and wishing to state for any transfers (or other observers) the following suggestions:
- Clergy sexual abuse is not solely a gay issue; it is about people who use their position of power to dominate, coerce, and destroy young lives.
- Having same-sex abusive contact with a child does not necessarily constitute homosexuality.
- Bishops who have knowingly sheltered predators are the biggest criminals.
Peace, Ell.
"By definition these were homosexual sex acts."
By the same definition, all masturbation is homosexual activity. By the same definition, every victim is also homosexual.
Seriously though, a person can be coerced into same-sex activity. Such coercion can be external: the violence of a prison, or being overpowered by an adult. And a perpetrator might also carry the burden of prior abuse, acting out with same-sex minors, but without the root orientation presumed. Ell, I think your argument is specious.
Todd,
Are you saying that there is some kind of condition other than homosexuality that induces large numbers of men to attempt sexual activity with physically mature adolescent males.
Are you saying that this condition is prevalent in the Catholic priesthood to a much higher degree than in the general population?
Are you saying that interest in adolescent boys is not a common feature of gay eroticism?
Peace, Charles.
Welcome to the site. Answering your questions: yes, no, and it depends. Traditionally, there is amongst some groups, a proclivity to seduce or coerce young men. It happens in "traditional" heterosexual culture as well and was once celebrated as boys or young men gaining sexual experience from an older woman. This was very much a part of the experience of my father's generation.
I'm not sure I would peg interest in young boys as necessarily a gay eroticism. What I'm saying is that it is most likely a psychological development in which the perp cannot choose relationships with equals. I would say this of any person drawn exclusively to pairing with younger, more inexperienced, more innocent, etc.. Very safe for the perp to avoid confrontation.
Details unfold in diocesan cash probe
Zgoznik, 36, had worked under Smith in the diocesan finance office until 1999. The friends each owned vacation condominiums in Zephyrhills, Fla., and continued to share the wealth of their businesses after Zgoznik left diocesan employ in 1999. But Zgoznik continued to handle diocesan accounting work as a consultant, teaming up with Zrino Jukic, president of ZJ & Associates Inc. of Mentor.
Records show the diocese was by far its biggest customer.
In 2000, for instance, ZJ received more than $1.2 million - almost all of it from the diocese, related departments and parishes, according to monthly bank-deposit statements.
The same year, Zgoznik and Jukic wrote more than $193,000 in checks to Smith's companies.
ZJ also wrote nearly $85,000 in checks that year to Thomas J. Kelley, then chief operating officer of the diocesan-affiliated Catholic Cemeteries Association, for unspecified services. In the past six years, records show, ZJ and a successor firm paid Kelley and his management company more than $331,000. In 2000 alone, the association paid ZJ $135,000 for accounting services.
Kelley, who has retired, could not be reached for comment.
Private companies controlled by the chief financial officer of the Cleveland Catholic Diocese received more than $750,000 from an accounting firm the CFO had hired to work for the diocese.
The checks were written over the past six years to companies of Joseph H. Smith, the diocese's highest-rank ing lay employee. The transactions are under investigation by the diocese, which suspended Smith this week, and the matter has been referred to law-enforcement authorities.

This
[
Join
|
Previous
|
Next
|
Skip Previous
]
[
Skip Next
|
Next 5 Sites
|
Previous 5 Sites
|
List Sites
]
|
|---|
This
[ Previous 5 Sites | Skip Previous | Previous | Next] [ Skip Next | | List Sites] |
| |||||||||
![]() |
This
Catholic
Moms on the Internet site is owned by
My Domestic Church. |
![]() |
|
|
